Efeito de dois tratamentos de fisioterapia na fibromialgia: ensaio paralelo randomizado
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUÇÃO: Fibromialgia (FM) é uma síndrome caracterizada por dor severa, difusa e crônica, e uma magnitude de sintomas.Exercícios de flexibilidade são indicados para o tratamento de dor crônica por disfunções osteomioarticulares.O aprendizado sobre a FM, comportamentos saudáveis e perspectivas positivas no processamento de informações (resiliência) são imprescindíveis para os indivíduos com FM.O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o efeito de dois tratamentos para FM: Tratamento Aexercícios de flexibilidade em cadeias musculares baseados no método de Reeducação Postural Global associados à abordagem educativa segundo referencial da terapia cognitivo-comportamental (TCC) e Tratamento Bexercícios de flexibilidade segmentar associados à abordagem educativa segundo referencial da TCC.MÉTODOS:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".