Education, and the balance between dynamic and stationary functional connectivity jointly support executive functions in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graphical network characteristics and nonstationary functional connectivity features, both derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data, have been associated with cognitive performance in healthy subjects. How these features jointly relate to cognition in diseased states has not been investigated. In this study, 46 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis subjects underwent rsfMRI scans and a focused cognitive battery. With a sliding window approach, we examined six dynamic network features that indicated how connectivity changed over time as well as six measures derived from graph theory to reflect static network characteristics. Multiset canonical correlation analysis (MCCA) was then carried out to investigate the relations between dynamic network features, stationary network characteristics, cognitive testing, demographic, disease severity, and mood. Multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects demonstrated weaker connectivity strength, decreased network density, reduced global changes, but increased changes in interhemispheric connectivity compared to controls. The MCCA model determined that executive functions and processing speed ability measured by Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV (WAIS-IV) Working Memory Index, WAIS-IV Processing Speed Index, and the Verbal Fluency Test were positively correlated with education, dynamic connectivity, and static connectivity strength; while poor task switching was correlated with disease severity, psychiatric comorbidities such as depression, anxiety, and fatigue, and static network density. Taken together, our results suggest that better executive functioning in MS requires maintenance of a continued coordination between stationary and dynamic functional connectivity as well as the support of education, and dynamic functional connectivity may provide an additional cognitive biomarker of disease severity in the MS population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".