The Fatigue Behaviour of Welded and Bolted Shear Connectors in Composite Highway Bridges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At present, many Canadian bridges are overdue for rehabilitation or replacement. In the case of steel-concrete composite bridges, the shear connection between the concrete deck and the steel girders is a vital element of the bridge system, and has significant impacts on construction time, cost, structural integrity, and durability. The general performance of the shear connectors in these bridges is becoming an increasingly important issue, as existing bridges are used past their intended design lives, and new bridges are being designed with accelerated construction and longer service lives in mind. \nWelded shear studs are the standard method of shear connection in composite bridge construction, either cast-in-place or concentrated in grouted “shear pockets” in the case of steel-precast applications. The primary disadvantage of using welded shear studs in structures subjected to repeated loading is that they are believed to perform poorly from a fatigue perspective. As a result, design standards in North America require most bridges to have more than double the number of studs needed for ultimate strength purposes. This leads to construction challenges including arduous deck reinforcement placing, and it reduces the economy gained through steel-precast construction by requiring excessive numbers of shear pockets. It is possible that an enhanced understanding of the performance of welded shear studs in composite beams, including system effects, may allow for relaxed design provisions. High strength bolt shear connectors may be a viable alternative to shear studs in some cases, providing greater fatigue resistance due to the absence of welds, and having a higher material strength than conventional welded studs. \nThe work presented herein is aimed at increasing the state-of-understanding of the fatigue behaviour and reliability of welded shear studs in both cast-in-place and precast concrete composite bridge applications, while also presenting the benefits and drawbacks of two alternative high strength bolt shear connection concepts. A laboratory research program carried out at the University of Waterloo featured the testing of eighteen large-scale beam specimens over a period of two years. In addition to the laboratory work completed by the research team, the author used finite element and reliability analysis methods to augment the test results and extend their applicability to full-scale medium span highway bridges. \nOver sixty stud fatigue failures and four bolt fatigue failures were observed over the course of this study, greatly adding to a dearth of existing test results, and allowing the construction of a statistically meaningful fatigue design curve of the stud detail from beam tests for the first time. System effects of multiple stud failures were studied in a finite element model of a typical highway bridge girder and revealed that the current design rules are overly conservative for all bridge classes in the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, and for all bridge configurations except for short spans. The results support the proposed new fatigue category dedicated to welded shear studs, recognizing the unique redundant and uninspectable nature of the detail, and suggest a fatigue endurance limit of 36 MPa (one and a half times the current limit). It is proposed that the embedded high strength bolt detail be viewed as a viable alternative to studs, given greatly increased fatigue performance and exceptional ease of deconstruction. The benefits of such a connection would be particularly useful in combination with precast deck panels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".