Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates global leishmaniasis research output for the period 1997–2016 indexed by Science Citation Index-Expanded. Analysis indicates exponential growth in second ten year block. Study includes 14779 (article, article proceedings, letter, and review), out of 16198 records retrieved on various aspects of Leishmaniasis. The highest publications came from Brazil followed by USA and India. The publication activity increased for France, UK and USA and decreased for Iran, Belgium and Brazil. The average value of CPP is 23. RCI and CPP is more than world average for USA, UK, France, Germany, Switzerland, Canada and Netherlands. Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Brazil was the most prolific institution, Paracitology was found to be the most focussed sub-discipline and American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, USA was the most prefered journal and Sundar Shyam, of BHU was the most prolific author. Brazil with USA shows strongest mutual strength and highest publications in collaboration with each other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.026 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.072 | 0.553 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".