MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2893321649 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11687

Vibration Signature Analysis for Gearbox Spalling Detection

2016· dissertation· en· W2893321649 on OpenAlexaff
Weidong Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpallDemodulationVibrationWaveletHilbert–Huang transformEngineeringSignature (topology)Wavelet transformStructural engineeringComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)AcousticsArtificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Condition monitoring of gearboxes has been increasingly demanded in machinery maintenance. Many research efforts have been devoted to developing efficient and effective techniques for gear spalling detection. Most of them rely on predefined spalling and results are not representative in particular cases. This thesis presents a progressive development of the techniques to detect an irregular spall in a gearbox. Results show that well-adapted techniques such as amplitude demodulation and wavelet map are prominent in describing the amplitude modulation caused by a spall. Phase demodulation indicates the phase variation introduced by a spall. A fault indicator based on the ratio of spectral power is proposed to monitor the development of the spalling. An enhanced empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and Teager's Kaiser Energy Operator (TKEO) is developed to effectively extract the critical characteristics of spalling diagnosis. The relation between the digital signatures and the physical state of gear is comprehensively discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207