MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2893405235 · doi:10.1115/omae2018-78014

Assessment of Current Offshore Supply Vessel Capabilities for Crew Transfer Operations in the Flemish Pass

2018· article· en· W2893405235 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mitchell Anderson, David Molyneux

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Coastal Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrewSubmarine pipelineMarine engineeringDeckFlemishCurrent (fluid)ShoreCruiseRange (aeronautics)GeologyOceanographyEnvironmental scienceEngineeringAeronauticsGeographyArchaeologyAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Flemish Pass is a region off the coast of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador in which large oil discoveries have been made in recent years, making it a promising site for future offshore oil and gas developments. The site is located approximately 200 kilometers North-East of the currently producing Jeanne D’Arc Basin. This results in some additional challenges, including: higher waves and rougher seas on average, longer transit time from shore to any potential production facilities, and an increased risk of sea ice. Crew transfers from Offshore Supply Vessels (OSVs) to current production platforms offshore Newfoundland and Labrador are typically accomplished with a FROG-6 personnel-transfer capsule lifted by a platform-board crane. In current practice, for fixed platforms, this is only done when there is a Significant Wave Height (Hs) of 4.0 m or less, regardless of the OSV being used. In the winter months, this general-purpose approach does not allow for an acceptably high operational fraction of time in which crew transfers could be completed in the Flemish Pass. The FROG-6 capsule has designated operational limits based on the relative velocity between the capsule and the vessel deck, which will vary based on ship size, loading condition, and sea-state. Considering this, a series of geometrically similar OSV hull forms are created to represent the range of currently operating vessels. The developed models are between 70.0–90.0 m long, have a maximum breadth between 17.0–22.0 m, and block coefficients ranging from 0.65–0.79. Using ShipMo3D, a potential flow / panel code seakeeping solver, a 20 minute time history of ship motions is determined for all the modelled OSVs, across the range of sea-states realistically expected in the Flemish Pass. Then, a MATLAB script is used to transform these motions into deck velocities. From these results, the operational limits for crew transfer can be re-defined as a function of ship size, loading condition, and sea-state. This results in higher operability percentages than those achieved from using the flat wave height limit alone, with relatively large variations between differently sized and loaded ships. Further work must be done to officially implement new limits, such as: analysis of additional wave period and height combinations, further analysis of the time between limit exceedances, computational fluid dynamics simulations, “smart crane” modelling, and/or full scale sea trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and Coastal ResearchFrench-language works237,207