MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2893474862 · doi:10.4000/bssg.241

Towards the Rediscovery of Québécois Publishers’ Catalogues

2018· article· en· W2893474862 on OpenAlexaffabout
Josée Vincent

Bibliographic record

VenueBiens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPolitical scienceLibrary sciencePsychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. How did the database project begin?The history of the book was developed to take into account phenomena related to written works, as much in their cultural as in their economic or political dimensions; for this reason, it has always privileged quantitative approaches. The early work by Daniel Mornet in Les Origines intellectuelles de la Révolution française (1933), or Lucien Febvre and Henri-Jean Martin in L’Apparition du livre (1999/1958) already conveyed the desire to comprehend vast co...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.055
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.131
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0550.131
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.019
Science and technology studies0.0140.017
Scholarly communication0.0410.026
Open science0.0050.010
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiens Symboliques / Symbolic GoodsSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207