MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2893550732 · doi:10.1115/omae2018-78405

Efficient Computation of Irregular Wave Wire Stresses in Flexible Risers

2018· article· en· W2893550732 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriel Rombado, Nathan Cooke, D. T. R. Pasala, Xianglei Ni, Andrew Low, Arya Majed

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodComputationNonlinear systemStructural engineeringEnvelope (radar)CurvatureKinematicsStress (linguistics)Tension (geology)ArmourEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringUltimate tensile strengthMaterials scienceGeometryPhysicsAlgorithmComposite materialMathematicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate computation of tensile armor wire stresses remains a major challenge in flexible riser fatigue life predictions and integrity management. Accuracy of the results relies heavily on capturing the kinematics of the flexible’s helically contra-wound tensile armor layers and their interaction with the other metallic and thermo-plastic layers in a dynamic simulation. The standard industry practice to assess the fatigue life of flexibles is to use high fidelity 3D Finite Element Models (FEMs) to capture the complex kinematics and produce accurate stresses. However, direct simulation of flexible riser detailed FEMs is limited to regular wave analyses and computation of wire stress time-histories subjected to irregular waves have been computationally infeasible. This is due to the complexity of the nonlinear FEM and the long simulation time of the irregular wave environment coupled with large number of fatigue sea states. As a result, simplified approaches which do not directly simulate the local model and instead assume that wire stresses can be interpolated based on static stress versus curvature material curves within a pre-defined tension /pressure envelope have been utilized. This paper utilizes Nonlinear Dynamic Substructuring (NDS), a simulation-based approach that that extends the framework of dynamic substructuring to nonlinear problems. NDS enables the efficient nonlinear dynamic simulation of multiple pitch lengths of detailed flexible riser FEM subjected to irregular wave inputs and the computation of wire stress time-histories at any location on the local model. In this paper, a 14-inch diameter flexible riser under consideration by ExxonMobil is subjected to vessel motion and wave load in irregular wave environments and is modeled using a detailed 3D FEM and simulated via NDS. The flexible riser design features four tensile armor layers to mitigate localized lateral buckling of the wires near the touch down point. Tension and curvature time-histories of the riser near the hang-off, calculated from a conventional beam model global analysis, is used to drive a 5.1m long local model. Irregular wave wire stress time-histories extracted at the corners of the tensile armor wires are used to compute the fatigue life of the flexible. To demonstrate the inaccuracies associated with the regular wave approach, fatigue life is computed via the regular wave approach and compared against the irregular wave approach. It is shown that the NDS capability to efficiently compute irregular waves mitigates over- and under-predictions due to environment idealizations leading to a more accurate and reliable flexible riser life prediction and structural integrity assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMechanical stress and fatigue analysisFrench-language works237,207