Simulation of Behaviour of an Energy Storage Device During Installation Process in Lake Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A model of a compressed air energy storage unit is tested for tow-out and installation in the Ocean, Coastal & River Engineering (OCRE) Portfolio of the National Research Council of Canada (NRC). The proposed prototype accumulator is a cylinder of 36 m in diameter and 12 m in height, which will be installed at the bottom of Lake Ontario at about 60 m water depth. The model of the accumulator with scale 1:21.5 was fabricated at the Design and Fabrication Unit of NRC. Appropriate ballast systems were designed and applied for the tow out, installations and release mechanism tests. The model scale test was conducted to examine the hydrodynamic behavior of the accumulator during tow-out and set down operations. NRC’s Towing Tank and Offshore Engineering Basin test facilities were used for the tasks. In this paper only the installation case of the accumulator is reported and discussed. Relevant numerical simulations are also carried out. Comparisons of the numerical results with the experimental results show good agreement for the compared cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".