MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2893623622 · doi:10.1097/dss.0000000000001666

Methods of Standardizing Photography for Cellulite in the Buttocks and Thighs

2018· letter· en· W2893623622 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andreas Nikolis, Kaitlyn M. Enright

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatologic Surgery · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Imaging in Medicine
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalCanadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and PetroleumVictoria Park
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUnit (ring theory)Research centreOptometryLibrary scienceGeographyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erevna Innovations, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada Victoria Park Medispa, Westmount, Quebec, Canada Department of Plastic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada VP Clinical Teaching and Research Unit, Westmount, Quebec, Canada Erevna Innovations, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada Victoria Park Medispa, Westmount, Quebec, Canada VP Clinical Teaching and Research Unit, Westmount, Quebec, Canada A. Nikolis is a consultant speaker and research collaborator for Merz Pharma, Galderma, and Allergan. The remaining author has no conflicts of interest to report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatologic SurgerySame topicDigital Imaging in MedicineFrench-language works237,207