An introduced plant is associated with declines in terrestrial arthropods, but no change in stream invertebrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Riverine systems often spread non-native species, yet the co-occurring impacts of introduced riparian vegetation on aquatic- and terrestrial-derived resources are unknown. We compared aquatic and terrestrial arthropod communities and their flux into and out of streams in riparian reaches invaded and uninvaded by Robinia neomexicana, a woody plant introduced to a western Colorado watershed. We found that invaded reaches had fewer terrestrial arthropods collected off foliage, conceivably because of the plant’s later leaf-out phenology. Overall, seasonal and annual factors best described terrestrial and aquatic arthropod communities. However, when we evaluated vegetation and stream characteristics in lieu of season and year, we found terrestrial arthropod biomass and richness were negatively related to cover of R. neomexicana and positively related to vegetative cover, forb cover, and vertical vegetation structure. Our results suggest ecosystems respond to landscape variation differently, where directly related food web components (i.e., terrestrial arthropods on introduced vegetation) respond stronger than more distally related constituents (i.e., aquatic insects).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".