Synthesis and characterization of novel bis(pyridine-2(1<i>H</i>)-thiones) and their bis(2-methylsulfanylpyridines) incorporating 2,6-dibromophenoxy moiety
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The novel 1,4-bis(2,6-dibromo-4-formylphenoxy)butane (3), prepared from 3,5-dibromobenzaldehyde (1), reacted with different hydrazines 4a–4d and active methylene containing compounds 9a–9d to give the corresponding bis(hydrazones) 5a–5d and bis(cinnamonitriles) 11a–11d, respectively. Both bis(2-cyanoacetic acid hydrazide) derivative 5d and bis(thioacrylamide) derivative 11a were taken as synthetic precursors for the synthesis of the target molecules bis(pyridine-2(1H)-thione) derivative 10 and 13a–13c and their bis(2-methylsulfanylpyridine) derivative 14 and 17a–17c. Another synthetic route was designed to prepare the target molecules 14 and 17a–17c in a better yield using pyridine-2(1H)-thione) derivative 15 and 19a–19c. Characterization of the newly prepared compounds via elemental analyses and spectral data are established.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".