MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Становление и развитие инклюзивного образования: историко-генетический аспект

2017· article· ru· W2893852554 on OpenAlex
О. В. Воронова

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Самарского университета. История, педагогика, филология · 2017
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Social Development in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)State (computer science)FeelingDisadvantagedHistoryPolitical scienceGender studiesSociologyEconomic historyAncient historyPsychologyLawArtAestheticsSocial psychologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the highlighted historical periods in the article transformation of society and state attitude towards people with deviations in development is traced. Since the Archaic period and till the 10 th century, it is possible to observe how hostile feelings towards needy change on merciful relation. Since the 10-13 th century there is a princely, church and monastic care of patients. During the period from 14 th to the second half of the 17 th century the state approaches to care manifestation and training of patients and the disadvantaged are made out. The first attempts of special educational institutions creation for children with identified disabilities can be referred to the second half of the 19 th century. The system of special education develops in the second quarter of the 20 th century. In the nineties of the 20 th century in our country the start of inclusive education ideas was laid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0100.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it