MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2893866167 · doi:10.1200/jgo.18.75900

Religious Gathering as a Tool for Collaborative Cervical Cancer Prevention: Report From Nigeria

2018· article· en· W2893866167 on OpenAlexaff
C. Onwuka, Chisara C. Umezurike, Carlo Hendricks, Kelechi Eguzo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Global Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervical cancerFamily medicineContext (archaeology)CancerDenialCancer screeningBreast cancerCancer preventionGynecologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and context: Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer and a leading cause of mortality affecting Nigerian women. There is prevalent ignorance about the disease and reduced access to screening services in Nigeria due to a variety of reasons. Many religious leaders often view cancer as evil, thus perpetuating a culture of fear and denial. Religious events have been used to promote health awareness and access to preventive services in Nigeria, but not usually for cancer screening. A cancer survivor might use a religious event to provide a strong avenue for improving cancer awareness and access to screening. Aim: Report describes a successful collaborative integration of cervical cancer screening into a religious event led by a breast cancer survivor. Strategy/Tactics: The 2018 Annual Women's Gospel Forum at Susanna Homes was used by a cancer survivor to teach women about cervical cancer and early diagnosis. Information was circulated among the Church of Christ fellowship in southern Nigeria. Program/Policy process: A medical team (gynecologist and pathologist) provided free cancer screening to consenting women using Papanicolaou test VIA simultaneously, with Pap preceding VIA. All smears were handled according to standard protocol and the findings were classified using the Bethesda system for reporting Papanicolaou test. Participants were taught about cervical cancer, counseled on screening and follow-up care prior to consent. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Outcomes: Seventy-nine women at the event consented to the screening. The average participant was aged 51 years, but 90.6% (58/64) were above 30 years. Most (92.4%; 73/79) women were negative for squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), and six women had a low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). The prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology in this outreach was 7.6% (6/79), and mostly affected women aged 61-60 years. Table 1 describes the Papanicolaou test results. The result of VIA was recorded as positive or negative. What was learned: Participants provided positive feedback regarding integrating cervical cancer screening into a religious event, as it improved access and addressed ignorance. Leadership by a cancer survivor helped demystify the disease and encouraged women to be screened. Having a pathologist on site improved slides quality and reporting turn-around time. Project shows that collaboration between clinicians and religious leaders can improve cancer prevention. More physicians should be trained to provide these services and collaborate with community/religious organizations to provide screening outside of the clinical setting.[Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.401 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Global OncologySame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207