Enseignement supérieur : mythes et réalités de la révolution digitale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, à partir d’une revue de la littérature et de données empiriques collectées au cours d’entretiens semi-directifs, nous proposerons une analyse de l’influence de la digitalisation sur l’enseignement supérieur. Nous porterons plus particulièrement notre l’attention sur l’évolution de la façon d’enseigner dans les écoles de management et sur les relations existant entre les organisations, les enseignants et les étudiants. Nous questionnerons la légitimité des organisations – les écoles de management – face à ce nouveau défi qui pourrait n’être qu’une mode. Dans la discussion nous évoquerons plus particulièrement trois points : a) l’effet de mimétisme des organisations face au digital ; b) la nouvelle quête de légitimité des organisations ; et c) l’évolution potentielle du Business model des organisations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".