Crystal structures of the solvent-free and ethanol disolvate forms of 4,4′-(diazenediyl)bis(2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzoic acid) exemplifying self-stabilized azobenzene <i>cis</i>-configurations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
cis -4,4′-(Diazenediyl)bis(2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzoic acid), C 14 H 2 F 8 N 2 O 4 , and its ethanol disolvate, C 14 H 2 F 8 N 2 O 4 ·2C 2 H 5 OH, represent new examples of self-stabilized cis -configured azobenzenes obtained by a common crystallization procedure at room temperature under normal laboratory lighting conditions. The target structure constitutes of two 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzoic acid residues linked to each other by a cis -configured azo group and was confirmed for two isolated specimens extracted from the same sample, corresponding to a solvent-free form and an ethanol disolvate. In the solvent-free form, the molecule is characterized by rotational symmetry around a twofold rotation axis bisecting its central N=N bond while this symmetry is not present in the solvated form. The values of the inclination angles of the terminal carboxyl groups towards the corresponding benzene rings vary from 5.2 (4) to 45.7 (2)°, depending on the crystal composition. In the unsolvated form, the molecules are linked through identical hydrogen bonds with a classical R 2 2 (8) graph-set ring motif of carboxylic acids, by generating supramolecular chains running approximately parallel to [101]. The presence of ethanol in the solvated form also leads to changes in the short-contact pattern to produce both the R 4 4 (12) ring and open-chain motifs with alternating alcohol and dicarboxylic acid molecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".