MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894069389 · doi:10.1002/jmri.26327

Quantitative Identification of Nonmuscle‐Invasive and Muscle‐Invasive Bladder Carcinomas: A Multiparametric MRI Radiomics Analysis

2018· article· en· W2894069389 on OpenAlex
Xiaopan Xu, Xi Zhang, Qiang Tian, Huanjun Wang, Long‐Biao Cui, Shurong Li, Xing Tang, Baojuan Li, José Dolz, Ismail Ben Ayed, Zhengrong Liang, Jing Yuan, Peng Du, Hongbing Lu, Yang Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBladder cancerRadiomicsReceiver operating characteristicDiscriminative modelMedicineDiffusion MRISupport vector machineEffective diffusion coefficientMann–Whitney U testArtificial intelligenceRadiologyComputer scienceMagnetic resonance imagingCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Preoperative discrimination between nonmuscle‐invasive bladder carcinomas (NMIBC) and the muscle‐invasive ones (MIBC) is very crucial in the management of patients with bladder cancer (BC). Purpose To evaluate the discriminative performance of multiparametric MRI radiomics features for precise differentiation of NMIBC from MIBC, preoperatively. Study Type Retrospective, radiomics. Population Fifty‐four patients with postoperative pathologically proven BC lesions (24 in NMIBC and 30 in MIBC groups) were included. Field Strength/Sequence 3.0T MRI/T 2 ‐weighted (T 2 W) and multi‐b‐value diffusion‐weighted (DW) sequences. Assessment A total of 1104 radiomics features were extracted from carcinomatous regions of interest on T 2 W and DW images, and the apparent diffusion coefficient maps. Support vector machine with recursive feature elimination (SVM‐RFE) and synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) were used to construct an optimal discriminative model, and its performance was evaluated and compared with that of using visual diagnoses by experts. Statistical Tests Chi‐square test and Student's t ‐test were applied on clinical characteristics to analyze the significant differences between patient groups. Results Of the 1104 features, an optimal subset involving 19 features was selected from T 2 W and DW sequences, which outperformed the other two subsets selected from T 2 W or DW sequence in muscle invasion discrimination. The best performance for the differentiation task was achieved by the SVM‐RFE+SMOTE classifier, with averaged sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic of 92.60%, 100%, 96.30%, and 0.9857, respectively, which outperformed the diagnostic accuracy by experts. Data Conclusion The proposed radiomics approach has potential for the accurate differentiation of muscle invasion in BC, preoperatively. The optimal feature subset selected from multiparametric MR images demonstrated better performance in identifying muscle invasiveness when compared with that from T 2 W sequence or DW sequence only. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1489–1498.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it