PA 05-5-1993 A school-based program to reduce injuries through neuromuscular training: isprint a cluster-randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Sport-specific neuromuscular training (NMT) warm-up programs have been shown to be effective in reducing injuries in youth sport but the effectiveness in school physical education (PE) is unknown. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of iSPRINT, a NMT warm-up program implemented in junior high school (ages 11–15) PE classes in reducing sport and recreational (S and R) injury risk. Methods This is a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Participants were 1067 grade 7–9 students (53.7% female, 46.3% male) from 12 Calgary, Canada schools. iSPRINT is a 15 min NMT warm-up including aerobic, agility, strength, and balance exercises. Teachers in intervention schools (n=6) implemented the iSPRINT 12 week warm-up program in PE classes, while control schools (n=6) implemented a standard-of-practice warm-up. All teachers participated in a training workshop; only intervention school teachers participated in practical NMT components, receiving NMT video. An athletic therapist blinded to study group allocation, visited schools on a weekly basis to assess S and R injuries over 12 weeks. Injuries were those that resulted in the inability to complete a session, time loss and/or medical attention. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated based on multivariable Poisson regression analyses (adjusting for sex, clustering by class, offset by S and R participation hours). Findings The S and R injury incidence rates (IR) for all injury for the intervention and control groups respectively were1.5 and 1.8 injuries/1000 participation hours (IRR=0.73, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.16), for medical attention injuries were 0.7 and 1.3 (IRR=0.59, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.82), and 0.9 and 1.3 for lower extremity injuries (IRR=0.81, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.19). The injury incidence rate was significantly higher in females compared to males (IRR=1.59, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.22). Conclusion The iSPRINT NMT warm-up was effective in preventing medically treated S and R injuries in junior high school students. Further analysis will consider program adherence. Policy implications This research will inform safety policy considerations in junior high school PE programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".