PROSPECTS AND PROBLEMS OF USING ALUMINUM ALLOYS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the article, authors consider the world experience of using aluminum alloys in the construction and reconstruction of bridges: a bridge over the Saguenay River (Canada), the Riekerhavenburg lift bridge (Netherlands), the Real Ferdinando Bridge (Italy), the Gateshead Millennium Bridge (England) lift bridge, the Qatar pedestrian bridge, the "Kolomenski" Bridge in St. Petersburg and pedestrian bridges in Nizhny Novgorod. Advantages of Aluminum alloys properties over other materials are presented. The authors considered the technology of substituting steel reinforced concrete slabs for carriageway bridges on an aluminum plate, which allows reducing the weight of the structure and significantly increase in the lifting capacity of the reconstructed bridge. In addition to a number of obvious advantages of aluminum bridges, there are factors that do not allow their wide introduction on the territory of the Russian Federation. Current United States and European codes were analyzed. For determining properties of an aluminum alloys a testing program for a series of samples and a full-sized pedestrian bridge a testing program was compiled. The use of aluminum alloys in the construction of bridges is profitable from a commercial point of view, will reduce the impact of maintenance operations on the environment, leading to a minimization of the consumption of materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it