MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894144100 · doi:10.14505//jarle.v9.1(31).21

Formula of Investment Success: Comparative Analysis of Legislation for Investment Activities Development

2018· article· en· W2894144100 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Regulatory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationInvestment (military)Profit (economics)Foreign direct investmentOpen-ended investment companyBusinessGovernment (linguistics)Market economyEconomicsReturn on investmentPolitical scienceLawPoliticsMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investments are an integral part of the modern economy, as they contribute to making a profit and achieving a positive effect. Therefore, the author chose this topic for study. The main purpose of the work is to determine the investment success, using the example of development of investment activities of the United States and Japan. The author found that 74% of all direct foreign investment of the United States is investment in developed countries, where you can get a good profit. First of all, American business invests in the Netherlands, Britain, Luxembourg, Canada, Ireland. Having studied the issue of investment success, the author derived a formula that promotes development. It includes liberal legislation, a government collegial body, additional mechanisms, free economic zones, access to the global market and internal potential. These components contribute to the development of investment activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it