MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894169953

Security Concerns on Adoption of Cloud Computing

2014· article· en· W2894169953 on OpenAlex
Bilal Charif

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Data Security Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer securityComputer scienceCloud computing securityBusinessInternet privacyOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project aims to investigate the status of cloud computing among business and government organizations, and to understand the security concerns of organizations regarding the adoption of cloud. The study shows that some government agencies lag behind using cloud computing, while others are leading the way. The literature was reviewed and much was discovered about the complexity of cloud computing. Then a survey was done and some participants agreed to follow up interviews in order to clarify the status of cloud acceptance. Security issues were found to be the major reason for delay in cloud adoption. However, the literature shows that proper adoption of the cloud actually increases security. Results of the data analysis shows that the US, and Canada lag behind industry in adopting the cloud, while in the UK, Australia and part of the EU governments are leading the way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it