La protección de la libertad de expresión en el marco de las relaciones colectivas de trabajo en Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente articulo presenta y analiza la manera como el derecho quebequense protege la libertad de expresion en el marco de las relaciones colectivas de trabajo, a luz de la Carta de derechos y libertades de la persona, de su interpretacion por parte de los tribunales nacionales y de la doctrina especializada. Se aborda, en primer lugar, como el derecho nacional define y protege la libertad de expresion. En segundo lugar, se analizan los alcances de la proteccion acordada a la libertad de expresion de los trabajadores en el marco de las relaciones colectivas de trabajo, particularmente a favor de los dirigentes sindicales, asi como la tutela de su ejercicio colectivo (piquetes), teniendo en cuenta los limites que derivan de los deberes de lealtad y de obediencia. Finalmente, se trata la cuestion del ejercicio por parte del empleador de la libertad de expresion en el contexto de sus interacciones de naturaleza colectiva con los trabajadores, especificamente en los momentos de la creacion de un sindicato, de la negociacion colectiva y de la aplicacion de la convencion colectiva del trabajo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".