An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Non-isothermal Cup Drawing of a 7XXX-T76 Aluminum Alloy Sheet
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 7000-series of aluminium alloys are an attractive material for anti-intrusion components in the car body-in-white due to their high specific strength and lower density. The limited room temperature formability of these alloys can be overcome through elevated temperature forming while controlling heat exposure to prevent changes to the microstructure such as over-aging. The present work details a comprehensive characterization of a developmental alloy, 7xxx-T76, for non-isothermal warm forming of a cylindrical deep drawn cup. Material anisotropy and a non-associated constitutive model were developed with the hardening response as a function of temperature and strain-rate. Friction was characterized at elevated temperature using a Warm Twist Compression Test apparatus developed at the University of Waterloo. Significant material anisotropy was observed in the tensile characterization results and during warm forming with the formation of eight ears in the deep drawn cups for a drawing ratio of 2.25. The predictions of the forming model were evaluated in terms of the earring profile, punch force, and surface strains from optical strain measurements using ARGUS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it