Relation of direct foreign investments and economic growth: panel data analysis on APEC countries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose-In this study, relation between direct foreign investments and economic growth had been analyzed for 11 APEC countries (Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Russia and USA) in between era of 1990-2016 with the help of panel data analysis. Methodology-In this purpose, stability of variables had been searched by Im,Peseran and Shin Panel Unit Root Tests, Maddala and Wu Panel Unit Root Tests and Coi Panel Unit Root Tests to obtain unbiased predictions in study. Then, panel cointegration and causality tests had been applied. Findings-At the end of the research, it had been determined that existence of causality relation between series and there is unidirectional causality from direct foreign investments to economic growth. Conclusion-Although direct foreign investment in most of the developing countries is not directly linked to economic development, capital, technology and knowledge transfer which indirectly contributes. For this reason, developing countries are encouraging foreign direct investment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it