MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PW 1932 Biomechanical determinants of hip fracture in older adults: evidence from video capture of falls in long-term care

2018· article· en· W2894347836 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityFraser HealthUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPelvisHip fractureFracture (geology)MedicinePoison controlInjury preventionPhysical therapyOrthodonticsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationOsteoporosisSurgeryGeologyMedical emergencyGeotechnical engineeringInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over 95% of hip fractures in older adults are caused by falls. Understanding the circumstances of falls involving hip fracture should guide prevention efforts. This study examined falls captured on video in long-term care and compared the mechanics of falls that resulted in hip fracture to falls that did not. Between 2008 and 2017, we video-captured 1730 falls by 534 individuals. Hip fracture was documented in 34 falls (age=85±8 years, 65% female). We analysed each video with a structured questionnaire to determine the biomechanical characteristics of falls. Generalized Estimating Equation statistical models were used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) for hip fracture associated with each factor. All 34 falls involving hip fracture were from standing height and involved the pelvis striking the floor. Falls during walking or standing were more likely to result in hip fracture (RR=7.38; 95% CI: 2.27–24.02) than other activities. When comparing to other directions, hip fracture was more common in falls initially directed sideways (2.70; 1.39–5.21) and for sideways landing configurations (5.55; 2.61–11.78). Impact to the lateral aspect of pelvis created higher risk (3.34; 1.55–7.17) compared to an impact to the anterior or posterior pelvis. Among hip fracture cases, pelvis was among the first three sites of impact. Impact to pelvis occurred on the posterolateral aspect in 70% of cases, lateral in 18%, posterior in 6%, and anterolateral in 6%. Hip protectors were worn in 66% of cases that did not involve hip fracture and in 47% involving hip fracture, which showed a decreased risk for fractures (0.46; 0.23–0.95). In summary, the mechanics of falls involving hip fracture were different than non-fracture falls regarding fall height, fall direction, impact locations, and use of hip protectors. The high prevalence of impact to the posterolateral aspect of pelvis may be important to the design of wearable hip protectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it