Provenance analysis of the Dezadeash Formation (Jurassic–Cretaceous), Yukon, Canada: implications regarding a linkage between the Wrangellia composite terrane and the western margin of Laurasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Mesozoic convergence of the allochthonous Wrangellia composite terrane (WCT) with the western margin of Laurasia coincided with the construction of the Chitina magmatic arc on the WCT, and the dispersal of volcanic flows and sediment gravity flows into an adjacent flysch basin. The basin, preserved as the Gravina–Nutzotin belt, includes the Dezadeash Formation in southwest Yukon, the Nutzotin Mountains sequence in southern Alaska, and the Gravina belt in southeastern Alaska. The Dezadeash Formation is a submarine fan system comprising stacked channel-lobe transition and lobe deposits interposed with overbank deposits. Conglomerate pebble-counts, sandstone point-counts, detrital zircon ages, and major element, trace element, rare earth element, and Sm–Nd isotopic geochemistry of sandstone, mudstone, and hemipelagite beds suggests that the deposits consist mainly of first-cycle volcanogenic detritus shed from the undissected Chitina arc, in addition to material eroded from the WCT. The arc was constructed of undifferentiated magma sourced from the depleted mantel, as well as older crustal material attributed to the WCT proxying for continental crust. The compositional provenance results, together with published paleocurrent data for the Dezadeash Formation and compositional and directional provenance indicators from the Nutzotin Mountains sequence and Gravina belt, does not require a sediment source from Laurasia. The provenance record is compatible with deposition of the Gravina–Nutzotin belt in a convergent plate margin setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".