MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894496745 · doi:10.1002/pbc.27464

Feasibility of high‐dose chemotherapy protocols to treat infants with malignant central nervous system tumors: Experience from a middle‐income country

2018· article· en· W2894496745 on OpenAlexaff
Alya Elshahoubi, Eman Khattab, Hadeel Halalsheh, Kawther Khaleifeh, Éric Bouffet, Nisreen Amayiri

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersKing Hussein Cancer Center
KeywordsMedicineMedulloblastomaMucositisRadiation therapyChemotherapyNeutropeniaPediatricsRetrospective cohort studyPrimitive neuroectodermal tumorSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Results of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) protocols for the management of malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors in infants are mostly reported in high-income countries. We evaluated the feasibility and results of such protocols in a middle-income country (Jordan). METHODS: A retrospective study of infants' charts with CNS tumors between 2006 and 2015 who were treated according to HeadStart (HS) protocols. Data included patients' demographics, chemotherapy complications, and cost. RESULTS: We identified 18 patients with median age 29 months (range, 9-62 months) at diagnosis (12 HS-I and six HS-II). Distribution according to pathology was: atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRT) (nine), primitive neuoroectodermal tumors (PNET)/pineoblastoma (five), and medulloblastoma (four). Six patients (33%) had metastatic disease, and 14 (78%) had an incomplete resection. Eleven patients achieved partial or complete remission, two stabilized, and five progressed. Ten patients did not proceed to HDCT due to progression (five), financial reasons (two), failure to collect stem cells (one), and undocumented reasons (two). Seventy-eight chemotherapy cycles were administered (median interval 26 days). Main complications during induction and consolidation were febrile neutropenia (73% and 100%), documented infections (8% and 13%), and mucositis (12% and 88%), respectively. Three patients developed moderate hearing loss. No protocol-related mortality was reported. At the last follow-up, five patients were alive: three with medulloblastoma (19, 29, and 89 months) and two with ATRT (18 and 42 months). Three survivors received focal/craniospinal radiation. The median cost of a complete HS protocol, excluding surgery/radiotherapy, was $103 500 per patient; 39% of the median cost was related to pharmacy expenses. CONCLUSIONS: These protocols were manageable in our context of limited health care resources. However, considering the significant costs and the modest survival rate, better selection criteria need to be used to identify patients likely to benefit from this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Blood & CancerSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207