MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894509063 · doi:10.12737/stp-43201808

Magnetospheric response of two types in PSc geomagnetic pulsations to interaction with interplanetary shock waves

2018· article· en· W2894509063 on OpenAlexfundno aff
V. A. Parkhomov, Vladimir Parhomov, N. L. Borodkova, Н. Л. Бородкова, A. G. Iakhnin, Tero Raita, Б. Цэгмэд, Сергей Хомутов, Sergey Khomutov, Александр Пашинин, Виталий Чиликин, Vitaliy Chilikin, Алексей Мочалов, Aleksey Mochalov

Bibliographic record

VenueSolar-Terrestrial Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationGraduate School, University of MarylandFar East Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesSiberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesMinistrstvo za Izobraževanje, Znanost in ŠportJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchCanadian Space AgencyUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPhysicsMagnetosphereIonosphereInterplanetary spaceflightEarth's magnetic fieldImpulse (physics)GeophysicsShock waveBroadbandComputational physicsMagnetic fieldSolar windOpticsMechanicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the June 22, 2015 event as an example, we present new data confirming the presence of a precursor of the sudden magnetic impulse caused by a powerful interplanetary shock wave (ISW). The precursor in the form of a train of oscillations (broadband pulse) with a falling frequency in the range 0.25÷11 Hz with a duration of ~20 s, which had a spectral resonance structure, was recorded globally by a network of induction magnetometers at 18:33:27 UT. No significant phase delays of the signals were detected in four frequency bands at widely spaced observatories. It is suggested that the impulse can be excited in the Earth – ionosphere waveguide by a pulsed electric field which occurs in the ionosphere due to the short-term impact of ISW on the magnetosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSolar-Terrestrial PhysicsSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207