Linear Sensor Arrangement for Softwood Grain Angle Measurements by Directional Reflection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A linear sensor arrangement is presented as a means of measuring the three-dimensional grain angle of wood. The measurement principle is based on an optical characteristic of a wood surface where the microscopic cell structure causes preferential reflection of light perpendicular to the wood grain. This response is notable among the several other techniques for measuring wood grain angle in that it enables identification of diving (out-of-plane) angle in addition to the surface (within-plane) angle. The basic measurement principle has been previously investigated using a circular array of light sensors to measure the spatial distribution of the light reflected from a wood surface. That procedure works reasonably well for surface points near the center of the circle and for modest dive angles. The linear sensor arrangement investigated here is designed to extend measurement functionality so as to be able to measure grain angle at any point along a central line and over a greater range of dive angle. A prototype scanner system is presented together with example experimental results for clear wood samples and for a face knot sample.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it