MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In situ reconstruction of crystal shape grown in an axisymmetric Kyropoulos system

2018· article· en· W2894609958 on OpenAlexaff
Gourav Sen, Wenqing Jia, Yoann Malier, Liliana Braescu, Thierry Duffar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crystal Growth · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCephalopods and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds Unique Interministériel
KeywordsSapphireRotational symmetryCrystal (programming language)Crystal growthMaterials scienceWork (physics)In situTRACE (psycholinguistics)OpticsCrystallographyMechanicsComputer scienceChemistryPhysicsThermodynamicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kyropoulos growth system is used to grow large high quality sapphire crystals. But since they grow inside a sealed furnace, there is no established monitoring system to allow observing the growth. This makes it difficult to control the growth parameters ensuring a desired geometrical shape. In the present work a melt-height monitoring system is imagined in the growth system, which would allow the acquisition of the evolving melt level along with the pulling distance of seed and the measured weight of the growing crystal submerged in the melt. Based on all these parameters, it is demonstrated that it would be possible to trace the shape of the growing crystal. The needed accuracy for the measurement tools is studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crystal GrowthSame topicCephalopods and Marine BiologyFrench-language works237,207