Appréciations par les élèves de leur environnement socioéducatif et résultats aux épreuves externes communes en fin d’enseignement primaire : comparaison des établissements Freinet et traditionnels de l’enseignement communal liégeois
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La controverse sur les avantages de la pdagogie Freinet perdure depuis des dcennies tant pour les valeurs ajoutes apportes en matire d' environnement socioducatif qu' en ce qui concerne les comptences scolaires acquises. Notre tude mene dans l' enseignement communal de la ville de Lige (Belgique) o plus de 1500 lves sont inscrits dans des tablissements Freinet (14 % de la population scolaire) montre que, niveau socioconomique quivalent, les lves de 3e cycle des tablissements Freinet obtiennent des niveaux de rsultats aux preuves communes de franais, mathmatiques et veil similaires ceux des coles traditionnelles, mais s' en distinguent par leurs dclarations systmatiquement plus positives en ce qui concerne leur environnement socioducatif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it