MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2894761361 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.14961

Tolérance et confrontation

2002· book-chapter· fr· W2894761361 on OpenAlexaff
Khadiyatoulah Fall

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2002
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsFord Motor Company (Canada)Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les événements du 11 Septembre 2001 ne doivent pas remettre en question notre choix d’être tolérant et notre engagement dans la défense des valeurs qui fondent notre commune humanité. C’est dans l’épreuve, dit-on, qu’on peut évaluer la force des convictions. C’est dans l’obstination à défendre et à promouvoir les valeurs évoquées lorsqu’elles sont mises à mal qu’on leur donne consistance.Après les attentats du 11 septembre, qui portait quelque attention aux conversations de la vie quotidienn...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.029
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks→Same topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender→French-language works237,207→