MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894875576 · doi:10.24870/cjb.2017-a188

Gene expression and sequence analysis of known yield genes in high yielding varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L.)

2017· article· en· W2894875576 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
E.N. Suresh, Lakshmi Narayana Reddy Vamireddy, N. P. E. Reddy, M. Reddi Sekhar

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Biotechnology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOryza sativaGeneBiologyYield (engineering)Sequence (biology)GeneticsAgronomyBotanyHorticultureMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rice yield is governed mainly by three major traits viz. number of tillers per plant, grain number per panicle, and grain size which are directly associated with rice grain productivity. Rice yield is a complexly inherited trait governed by many genes/QTLs. As of now more than 34 genes have been molecularly cloned and characterized using the donors only from China and Japan (Xu et al., 2016). However, the expression of these genes and sequence variation need to be validated before directly using them in rice breeding programmes. In the present investigation, an attempt has been made to validate the gene expression and sequence variation of the important cloned genes governing yield traits in known donor varieties from India. In the current study, 21 indica rice genotypes have been selected. Among them 15 were high yielding and 6 were low yielding. The phenotypic data of the important yield and its component traits such as plant height, number of tillers per plant, panicle length, number of grains per panicle, biological yield, harvest index, etc. have been recorded. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the 21 rice genotypes for all the agronomic traits revealed highly significant differences among the entries for all the characters except for panicle length, grain length, and grain width. The samples of flag leaf and young panicle tissues were collected for RNA isolation and the isolated RNA was converted into cDNA. Semi qRT PCR gene expression analysis in the selected rice genotypes revealed differential expression of all yield genes. The Gn1a gene expression with low or nil gene expression such as NLR33892, Ranjit, BPT2601, BPT5204 and Rasi can be used as donors for Gn1a gene introgression into low yielding varieties. The gene OsSPL14 from high grain number varieties with high gene expression can be used as donor varieties viz. MTU1064, Dee-geo-woo-gen, Rasi, BPT5204, and MTU1010 for OsSPL14 gene from Indian rice germplasm. The high GIF1 gene expression varieties with high grain weight such as BPT 2678 and Basmati370 are the potential donors for grain weight/grain filling trait. The high grain weight varieties with high GW8 expression such as MTU3626, IR-8, Dee-geo-woo-gen, MTU1010, MTU1001, and INRC10192 can be used as donors from Indian rice germplasm. The Ghd7 high gene expression was observed in both high grain number genotypes such as NLR33892, BPT2678, Taichung Native-1, MTU1121, Ranjit and low grain number genotypes IR-8, MTU3626, MTU1001, MTU1064, Tetep, NLR34449 in flag leaf. In case of young panicles, high expression was recorded in high grain number genotypes such as NLR33892, Ravi003, BPT2678, MTU1121, Ranjit and in low grain number genotypes such as IR-8, MTU3626, MTU1001, MTU1064, Tetep, and NLR34449. The high gene expression was observed in both flag leaf and young panicles in both early flowering varieties and late flowering varieties with few exceptions. The high gene expression was observed in both flag leaf and young panicles in both tall plants and dwarf plants. The high grain number, tall plant and late flowering varieties with high Ghd7 expression such as NLR33892, BPT 2678 and Ranjit can be used as donors from Indian rice germplasm. In the present investigation, besides gene expression analysis, the DNA sequence variation of most differentially expressed yield genes such as Ghd7, DEP1 and Gn1a have also been analyzed in all high yielding and low yielding varieties. The overlapping primers covering the entire gene length including 1000 base pair upstream have been designed and sequenced. The whole genome DNA sequence of Ghd7 gene (3918 base pair) was resequenced in all 21 rice genotypes. In all 21 rice gentotypes, a total of 104 SNPs and 141 indels were detected. It was found that certain nucleotide variations are unique to high grain number varieties such as MTU1121, MTU1010, and Dee-Geo-Woo-Gen. However, there are no nucleotide variations which are common to their respective either low or high grain number varieties INRC10192, Tetep, and MTU1001. There are no nucleotide variations found specific to either tall or semidwarf varieties MTU7029 (G/A) at 1426 and MTU1001 (T/C) at 1425 base pair positions of the gene. There were no nucleotide variations specific to either early or late flowering varieties. The whole genome DNA sequence of DEP1 gene (4363 base pair) was resequenced in all high yielding and low yielding rice genotypes. In all varieties studied, 99 SNPs and 338 indels were detected in DEP1 gene. The whole genomic DNA sequence of Gn1a gene (6476 base pair) was resequenced in all genotypes. In total, 97 SNPs and 121 indels were detected in the 4837 base pair alignment. Of these, one SNP (MTU1064) and 28 indels were detected in the promoter region. To conclude, an attempt has been made to identify the Indian donor varieties comprising of important yield genes based on consistent gene expression and sequence analysis with reported donors. The shortlisted donors for the yield traits can be used right away in the rice breeding programmes. The marker-assisted stacking of different yield genes from these multiple donors into a single elite variety could pave the way for designing high yield varieties suitable to different ecologies of India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BiotechnologySame topicRice Cultivation and Yield ImprovementFrench-language works237,207