MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894878441 · doi:10.1002/9781119432463.ch8

Anoikis Regulation: Complexities, Distinctions, and Cell Differentiation

2018· other· en· W2894878441 on OpenAlexaff
Marco Beauséjour, Ariane Boutin, Pierre H. Vachon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnoikisProgrammed cell deathCellular differentiationApoptosisBiologyCell biologyCellNeuroscienceCell fate determinationCell survivalCancer cellCancerGeneticsTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell survival and apoptosis (a type of regulated cell death) are processes that involve an expanding complexity of regulating and executing molecular, as well as signaling, actors. Such an intricacy of process-controlling and -implementing players likewise administers, itself a subroutine of caspase-dependent apoptosis that is predominantly regulated by integrin-mediated, cell-ECM interactions. Interestingly, the complexities in regulating cell survival, apoptosis and anoikis implicate additional mechanistic distinctions depending on specific tissues, cell types and species. To these, the existence of further mechanistic distinctions according to the state of cell differentiation constitute yet another level of intricacy in the control of cell survival and anoikis. Considering the roles of anoikis in tissue development and homeostasis, as well as the physiopathological consequences of a deregulation of anoikis, there is a growing necessity for furthering analyses of differentiation state-distinct mechanisms in the control of anoikis, in order to improve our understanding of physiopathologies that are mainly caused, or driven, by a dysregulation of anoikis - such as specific degenerative diseases, as well as cancer progression and metastasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCell death mechanisms and regulationFrench-language works237,207