MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Bmpr2</i> Mutant Rats Develop Pulmonary and Cardiac Characteristics of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

2019· article· en· W2894893795 on OpenAlexafffund
Aurélie Hautefort, Pedro Mendes‐Ferreira, Jessica Sabourin, Grégoire Manaud, Thomas Bertero, Catherine Rücker‐Martin, Marianne Riou, Rui Adão, Boris Manoury, Mélanie Lambert, Angèle Boët, Florence Lecerf, Valérie Domergue, Carmen Brás‐Silva, Ana M. Gómez, David Montani, Barbara Girerd, Marc Humbert, Fabrice Antigny, Frédéric Perros

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université LavalFondation du Grand défi Pierre LavoieLaboratoire d'Excellence en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation ThérapeutiqueCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité Paris-SudInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueFondation du SouffleInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversité Paris-SaclayAgence Nationale de la RechercheLloyd's Tercentenary Research FoundationEuropean Respiratory SocietyUniversidade do PortoFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaKU LeuvenEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean CommissionUniversité Laval
KeywordsBMPR2MedicinePulmonary hypertensionInternal medicinePenetranceEndocrinologyPulmonary arteryVentriclePathologyGenePhenotypeBiologyGeneticsBone morphogenetic protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Monoallelic mutations in the gene encoding bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2 ( Bmpr2 ) are the main genetic risk factor for heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with incomplete penetrance. Several Bmpr2 transgenic mice have been reported to develop mild spontaneous PAH. In this study, we examined whether rats with the Bmpr2 mutation were susceptible to developing more severe PAH. Methods: The zinc finger nuclease method was used to establish rat lines with mutations in the Bmpr2 gene. These rats were then characterized at the hemodynamic, histological, electrophysiological, and molecular levels. Results: Rats with a monoallelic deletion of 71 bp in exon 1 (Δ 71 rats) showed decreased BMPRII expression and phosphorylated SMAD1/5/9 levels. Δ 71 Rats develop age-dependent spontaneous PAH with a low penetrance (16%–27%), similar to that in humans. Δ 71 Rats were more susceptible to hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension than wild-type rats. Δ 71 Rats exhibited progressive pulmonary vascular remodeling associated with a proproliferative phenotype and showed lower pulmonary microvascular density than wild-type rats. Organ bath studies revealed severe alteration of pulmonary artery contraction and relaxation associated with potassium channel subfamily K member 3 (KCNK3) dysfunction. High levels of perivascular fibrillar collagen and pulmonary interleukin-6 overexpression discriminated rats that developed spontaneous PAH and rats that did not develop spontaneous PAH. Finally, detailed assessments of cardiomyocytes demonstrated alterations in morphology, calcium (Ca 2+ ), and cell contractility specific to the right ventricle; these changes could explain the lower cardiac output of Δ 71 rats. Indeed, adult right ventricular cardiomyocytes from Δ 71 rats exhibited a smaller diameter, decreased sensitivity of sarcomeres to Ca 2+ , decreased [Ca 2+ ] transient amplitude, reduced sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ content, and short action potential duration compared with right ventricular cardiomyocytes from wild-type rats. Conclusions: We characterized the first Bmpr2 mutant rats and showed some of the critical cellular and molecular dysfunctions described in human PAH. We also identified the heart as an unexpected but potential target organ of Bmpr2 mutations. Thus, this new genetic rat model represents a promising tool to study the pathogenesis of PAH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207