Precise and Fast Cryptanalysis for Bloom Filter Based Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Being able to identify records that correspond to the same entity across diverse databases is an increasingly important step in many data analytics projects. Research into privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) aims to develop techniques that can link records across databases such that besides the record pairs classified as matches no sensitive information about the entities in these databases is revealed. A popular technique used in PPRL is to encode sensitive values into Bloom filters (bit vectors), which has the advantage of allowing approximate matching using character q-grams. PPRL based on Bloom filter encoding has been shown to be accurate and scalable to large databases, and is thus now being used in real-world PPRL systems in Australia, Canada, and the UK. However, recent studies have shown that Bloom filters used for PPRL are vulnerable to cryptanalysis attacks that can re-identify some of the sensitive values encoded in these Bloom filters. While previous such attack methods were slow and required knowledge of various encoding parameters, we present a novel efficient attack which exploits how attribute values are encoded into Bloom filters. Our attack method does not require knowledge of the encoding function or its parameter settings used. It is able to correctly re-identify with high precision q-grams that could not have been hashed to certain Bloom filter bit positions, and using these re-identified q-grams it can then re-identify attribute values with high precision. Our method is significantly faster than earlier PPRL cryptanalysis attacks, and in our experimental evaluation, it is able to successfully re-identify attribute values from large real-world databases in a few minutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".