MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895108905 · doi:10.1177/108648220200700505

Helping Students Find Their Place and Purpose

2002· article· en· W2895108905 on OpenAlexaff
Tony Chambers, Sharon Daloz Parks

Bibliographic record

VenueAbout Campus Enriching the Student Learning Experience · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling Practices and Supervision
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithMeaning (existential)Task (project management)PsychologyPedagogyHigher educationStudent developmentSpiritual developmentSocial psychologySociologySpiritualityEpistemologyManagementPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We may recognize that higher education can play a vital role in helping students find purpose and meaning, but how can we help our students with this broad and complex task? Sharon Parks shares her views with Tony Chambers about the challenge of creating an environment where mentoring can flourish and about how faith and spiritual development is becoming a larger part of our students’ lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbout Campus Enriching the Student Learning ExperienceSame topicCounseling Practices and SupervisionFrench-language works237,207