Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor–Induced Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The treatment of the malignant hematological diseases has been revolutionized by the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI): for example, imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Dasatinib, a second-generation TKI, has been reported to induce severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The mechanism of PAH development is presumed to be endothelial cell toxicity through the production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. There are other TKIs that are reported to cause PAH, such as: ponatinib, bosutinib, lapatinib, and lorlatinib. The management of PAH due to TKIs primarily involves stopping the TKI treatment, which can lead to clinical and hemodynamic normalization. A third of the patients who develop PAH can have persistent symptoms of dyspnea and right heart failure even after the interruption of the TKIs. For these patients, use of specific PAH treatment is indicated along with close follow-up. In rare cases, TKI-induced PAH can be fatal. Thus, early screening for PAH diagnosis and proper management is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".