MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895192044

I. Quarante ans de criminologie made in Ottawa : expériences et défis

2010· book-chapter· fr· W2895192044 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Françoise Vanhamme, Véronique Strimelle

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTIONLe Département de criminologie de l’Université d’Ottawa vient de célébrer ses 40 ans d’existence. Quelle est la nature du sentiment d’appartenance à cette institution de chacun des 32 professeurs permanents ? Quelle criminologie y pratique-t-on ? Peut-on parler d’une criminologie made in Ottawa ? Pour tenter de répondre à ces questions, nous proposons de retracer, dans ce chapitre, l’histoire du département, ses ambitions et ses orientations d’hier et d’aujourd’hui. Bien qu’une d...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0330.037
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207