MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895194524 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpddr.2018.10.001

A mutational and molecular dynamics study of the cys-loop GABA receptor Hco-UNC-49 from Haemonchus contortus: Agonist recognition in the nematode GABA receptor family

2018· article· en· W2895194524 on OpenAlexafffund
Josh Foster, Everett Cochrane, Mohammad Hassan Khatami, Sarah A. Habibi, Hendrick de Haan, Sean G. Forrester

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Parasitology Drugs and Drug Resistance · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGABA receptorReceptorBiologyAgonistCaenorhabditis elegansNematodeHaemonchus contortusAminobutyric acidFunction (biology)GABAA receptorIon channelgamma-Aminobutyric acidBiochemistryCell biologyGeneEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The UNC-49 receptor is a unique nematode γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-gated chloride channel that may prove to be a novel target for the development of nematocides. Here we have characterized various charged amino acid residues in and near the agonist binding site of the UNC-49 receptor from the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contorts. Utilizing the Caenorhabditis elegans GluCl crystal structure as a template, a model was generated and various charged residues [D83 (loop D), E131 (loop A), H137 (pre-loop E), R159 (Loop E), E185 (Loop B) and R241 (Loop C)] were investigated based on their location and conservation. These residues may contribute to structure, function, and molecular interactions with agonists. It was found that all residues chosen were important for receptor function to varying degrees. Results of the mutational analysis and molecular simulations suggest that R159 may be interacting with D83 by an ionic interaction that may be crucial for general GABA receptor function. We have used the results from this study as well as knowledge of residues involved in GABA receptor binding to identify sequence patterns that may assist in understanding the function of lesser known GABA receptor subunits from parasitic nematodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Parasitology Drugs and Drug ResistanceSame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207