MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895229614 · doi:10.1002/mrd.23064

John D. Biggers (1923–2018)

2018· article· en· W2895229614 on OpenAlex
Jay M. Baltz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Reproduction and Development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionBiologyLibrary scienceSociologyMedia studiesPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John D. Biggers, one of the true pioneers in the field of reproductive biology, passed away at his home in Lexington, Massachusetts on April 7, 2018. His scientific career spanned seven decades, with more than 175 peer-reviewed papers and many reviews and book chapters published beginning in 1951 and continuing through 2016. John was born in Reading, England, in 1923. He graduated from the Royal Veterinary College and obtained his Ph.D. from the University of London. He then moved to the University of Sydney in Australia to take up a post in Veterinary Physiology where he investigated estrogen signaling and developed estrogen assays in collaboration with Peter Claringbold in the department headed by Clifford Emmens. This period helped establish John’s lifelong passion for statistical and biometric analysis. In 1955, John D. Biggers returned to England, taking a faculty position at the Royal Veterinary College at the University of London, where he embarked on studies of tissue culture, initially focusing on organ culture of bones. The development of media for long-term growth of embryonic bones in vitro (Heyner & Biggers, 1958) established one of the research themes that drove his entire career—the development and optimization of chemically defined culture media. Anne McLaren was also in London by this time, and their complementary interests led to their historic collaboration. Their 1958 Nature paper, “Successful Development and Birth of Mice Cultivated In Vitro as Early Embryos,” provided the first demonstration that embryos that had developed in culture could produce normal offspring (McLaren & Biggers, 1958). This was one of the most important advances for experimental embryology and the eventual development of assisted reproduction technologies. In 1959, John moved to the US, where he held faculty positions at the University of Pennsylvania and The Johns Hopkins University before being appointed as the Professor of Physiology at Harvard Medical School, in 1972. From 1960s through early 1980s, he published extensively on the metabolism of preimplantation embryos and regulation of oocyte maturation, with trainees and collaborators who included Ralph Brinster, Wes Whitten, David Whittingham, Dale Benos, and many other well-known reproductive biologists. During this time, he also established methodologies for analysis of the preimplantation embryo and egg microenvironment in a long-lived collaboration with the biophysicist Claude Lechene and with Henry Leese. John was a founding member and second president of the Society for the Study of Reproduction (SSR), as well as the Editor of their journal Biology of Reproduction. He received the SSR’s highest award, the Carl G. Hartman Award, in 1987. The mid-1980s saw the establishment of the National Cooperative Program on Non-Human In Vitro Fertilization and Preimplantation Development under the leadership of Richard J (Dick) Tasca at the US National Institutes of Health. It was within this program, informally called the “Culture Club,” that the first media capable of supporting complete preimplantation embryo development from fertilized eggs to blastocysts were developed. Biggers’ KSOM embryo culture medium (Lawitts & Biggers, 1993) that was developed in an extensive series of investigations with his postdoctoral fellow Joel Lawitts, which used sophisticated statistical optimization techniques to drive medium formulation, is widely used today and is the basis for successful human clinical IVF culture media. The importance of the Culture Club, particularly the contributions of the Biggers laboratory, to the success of Human Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) cannot be overstated. John D. Biggers was also very much interested in the ethics of ART and wrote and lectured extensively on this subject. He was called to testify before the US Senate about IVF and embryo transfer and appointed by President Carter as Chief Scientific Advisor on the Ethics Board of the US Department of Health, Education and Welfare. John remained active in research until the end of his life. Most recently, he had an active collaboration with Mehmet Toner to develop methods of long-term storage of mouse sperm and had just completed a book chapter with his collaborator Catherine Racowsky. Only 2 years ago, he and his coauthor Carol Kountz authored a book on Walter Heape, an underappreciated pioneer in the field of reproduction who performed the first successful embryo transfer at the end of the 19th century (Biggers & Kountz, 2016). John traveled extensively including all seven continents, often with his wife, late Betsey Williams, a former faculty member in the Anatomy Department at Harvard. He was an excellent cook and a passionate bird watcher and photographer. He will be remembered as a valued collaborator, a superb mentor who trained many top researchers, and a talented scientist whose work includes some of the most important advances made in the field of reproduction (Figure 1). John D. Biggers and Anne McLaren with one of the mice from their landmark 1958 paper (McLaren & Biggers, 1958), which first reported that embryos that had been cultured in vitro before being transferred to a recipient female could give rise to a live offspring. Photo from John D. Biggers (Biggers, 2001)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it