Nonlinear Stochastic Attitude Filters on the Special Orthogonal Group 3: Ito and Stratonovich
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper formulates the attitude filtering problem as a nonlinear stochastic filter problem evolved directly on the Special Orthogonal Group 3 (SO(3)). One of the traditional potential functions for nonlinear deterministic complimentary filters is studied and examined against angular velocity measurements corrupted with noise. This paper demonstrates that the careful selection of the attitude potential function allows to attenuate the noise associated with the angular velocity measurements and results into superior convergence properties of estimator and correction factor. The problem is formulated as a stochastic problem through mapping SO(3) to Rodriguez vector parameterization. Two nonlinear stochastic complimentary filters are developed on SO(3). The first stochastic filter is driven in the sense of Ito and the second one considers Stratonovich. The two proposed filters guarantee that errors in the Rodriguez vector and estimates are semi-globally uniformly ultimately bounded in mean square. Simulation results are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed filters considering high level of uncertainties in angular velocity as well as body-frame vector measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it