MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895302239 · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.201

Free-electron laser data for multiple-particle fluctuation scattering analysis

2018· article· en· W2895302239 on OpenAlexaff
Kanupriya Pande, Jeffrey J. Donatelli, Erik Malmerberg, L. Foucar, Billy K. Poon, Markus Sutter, Sabine Botha, Shibom Basu, R. Bruce Doak, Katerina Dörner, Sascha W. Epp, Lars Englert, Raimund Fromme, Elisabeth Hartmann, Robert Hartmann, Guenter Hauser, Johan Hattne, Ahmad Hosseinizadeh, Stephan Kassemeyer, Lukas Lomb, Sebastian F. Carron Montero, Andreas Menzel, Daniel Rolles, Artem Rudenko, M. Seibert, Raymond G. Sierra, Peter Schwander, A. Ourmazd, Petra Fromme, Nicholas K. Sauter, Michael J. Bogan, John D. Bozek, Christoph Bostedt, Ilme Schlichting, Cheryl A. Kerfeld, Petrus H. Zwart

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsBurnaby Hospital
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesOffice of ScienceBasic Energy SciencesNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science FoundationNational Institutes of HealthAdvanced Scientific Computing ResearchMax-Planck-Gesellschaft
KeywordsScatteringDiffractionOpticsLaserPhysicsComputational physicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluctuation X-ray scattering (FXS) is an emerging experimental technique in which solution scattering data are collected using X-ray exposures below rotational diffusion times, resulting in angularly anisotropic X-ray snapshots that provide several orders of magnitude more information than traditional solution scattering data. Such experiments can be performed using the ultrashort X-ray pulses provided by a free-electron laser source, allowing one to collect a large number of diffraction patterns in a relatively short time. Here, we describe a test data set for FXS, obtained at the Linac Coherent Light Source, consisting of close to 100 000 multi-particle diffraction patterns originating from approximately 50 to 200 Paramecium Bursaria Chlorella virus particles per snapshot. In addition to the raw data, a selection of high-quality pre-processed diffraction patterns and a reference SAXS profile are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207