Simulation of Fluid forces in Fuel Bundles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vibrations of fuel bundles are major concerns as they can result in fretting wear damage at the interior surface of the pressure tube. The fretting damage takes place at the locations where the outer fuel elements come in contact with the pressure tube surface. The fretting wear results from the impact and sliding motion of the fuel elements against the pressure tube surface. In addition, structural problem in the form endplate cracking can take place due to these vibrations. One of the fluid forces that can greatly affect the dynamics of the fuel bundles are generated by the motion of the fuel elements in axial flow. The fluid force acting on any fuel element is assumed to be a linear combination of the fluid forces created by the motion of all surrounding fuel elements. These forces are expressed in terms of force coefficients representing the influence of these motions and can be decomposed into inertia, stiffness, and damping components. The numerical model is introduced the represent these forces in a flexible fuel kernel. The central element was given a period motion and the forces acting on the surrounding elements were obtained. The obtained force coefficients were used in an analytical framework to predict the fuel bundle vibrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".