MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895353676 · doi:10.1080/24745332.2018.1522239

Hemoptysis after exposure to a household insecticide spray: A case report and review of the literature

2018· article· en· W2895353676 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron J. Ruberto, Helene Morakis, Christine L. D’Arsigny

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPoisoning and overdose treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectRespiratory distressCOPDIntensive care medicineRespiratory systemAirwayAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a case of chemical pneumonitis with alveolar hemorrhage after acute exposure to a common household pyrethrin spray in a patient on anticoagulation with underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We review the relevant literature pertaining to adverse respiratory effects of pyrethrin based insecticide spray exposures. This case report highlights the importance of including potential inhaled household respiratory irritants in the differential for patients that present to the emergency department (ED) in respiratory distress. While aerosolized pyrethroid and pyrethrin containing domestic products generally do not cause significant respiratory symptoms when accidentally inhaled, the risk of serious adverse events may be increased in those patients with preexisting respiratory disease or who have used the product within a confined space. Timely recognition of adverse respiratory events related to pyrethroid or pyrethrin inhalation, airway protection and supportive care are the pillars of treatment for these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep MedicineSame topicPoisoning and overdose treatmentsFrench-language works237,207