MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895410282 · doi:10.7202/1051407ar

Difficultés éthiques liées à l’intervention auprès des femmes victimes de violence conjugale qui ne désirent pas dénoncer la violence qu’elles vivent aux autorités

2018· article· fr· W2895410282 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Célyne Lalande, Sonia Gauthier, Marie-Éve Bouthillier, Lyse Montminy

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-AppalachesCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des LaurentidesUniversité de MontréalMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Université du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article vise à expliciter certaines difficultés éthiques rencontrées par les intervenantes qui pratiquent auprès de femmes qui ne dénoncent pas aux autorités les agressions commises à leur endroit par leur conjoint alors que leur sécurité est compromise. Des entrevues réalisées auprès d’intervenantes psychosociales du Grand Montréal qui pratiquent auprès de ces femmes ont mis en lumière le fait que ces situations génèrent des défis éthiques complexes pour lesquels seuls quelques moyens de résolution sont disponibles. Quelques pratiques novatrices qui gagneraient à être implantées dans toutes les régions du Québec sont suggérées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.010
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceFrench-language works237,207