MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895421001 · doi:10.1177/0020731418804403

Home Care in Ontario: Perspectives on Equity

2018· article· en· W2895421001 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alla Yakerson

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Health Services · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealthcare innovation and challenges
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDignityEquity (law)Health carePoliticsIndependence (probability theory)NursingEconomic growthBusinessDeregulationPolitical scienceMedicineEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Home care is an integral aspect of the Canadian health care system. Services provided to individuals allow them to live with independence and dignity within the comfort of their own residences. This article examines the historical evolution of Ontario's home care reform and the current challenges faced by staff members, patients, and their caregivers in reference to health equity. Political economy and feminist lenses are used to highlight the impact of market-based health care reforms on gendered experiences and access to home care services. Research and reports are used to critique the development of the home care system to date. Findings suggest that the current home care system is underfunded, understaffed, and inequitable in access to care. At this time, policies strategically remain blinded to the harsh realities of the home care sector in order to justify cost cutting, deregulation, and privatization of services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Health ServicesSame topicHealthcare innovation and challengesFrench-language works237,207