MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895450841 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-10942

Film Classification in Canada and the United States: The Freedom of Government Control?

2015· dissertation· en· W2895450841 on OpenAlex
Timothy Covell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt History and Market Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityCanadiana.org
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamGovernment (linguistics)Subject (documents)Control (management)Public administrationPolitical scienceBusinessLawEconomicsManagementLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American film industry voluntarily classifies films, using the well-known MPAA ratings. The industry claims this is preferable and more liberal than the alternative approach of government classification. In Canada, film classification is mandatory in most jurisdictions, and performed by provincial governments. This thesis demonstrates that the Canadian government controlled mandatory ratings systems for films results in more liberal film ratings than the voluntary system in the United States, for most mainstream films. An analysis of one hundred recent releases and case studies support this conclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArt History and Market AnalysisFrench-language works237,207