MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895463715

Metis: Vessels: Yisabu Dokdo Memorial Park, International Competition, Samcheok, South Korea

2017· article· en· W2895463715 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adrian Hawker, Mark Dorrian

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh Research Explorer · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisGeographyCompetition (biology)ArchaeologyForestryEcologyBiologyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vessels is an architectural proposal that responds to an international architectural competition for a new Yisabu Dokdo Memorial Park for the city of Samcheok, South Korea. The project was one of five projects selected from an international field. It was awarded an Honourable Mention and selected for publication. Yisabu Dokdo Memorial Park is imagined as a new landscape defined by the presence of three large timber volumes that are elevated slightly above the ground. These Vessels recall the hulls of ships such of those the Navy of Silla. Their upturned forms shade and shelter areas of this new landscape and beneath them cluster the programmatic halls - delicate glass vitrines illuminated by the low light that enters under the Vessel ‘s lower edge. The spaces between these halls form gateways that guide visitors into the park. The project was designed and developed by Metis, the Atelier for Art, Architecture and Urbanism founded by Mark Dorrian and Adrian Hawker.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5990.170

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh Research ExplorerSame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207