MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895476349 · doi:10.7202/1051410ar

La conciliation travail-famille-soins

2018· article· fr· W2895476349 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sarah Nogues, Diane‐Gabrielle Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité TÉLUQ
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConciliationPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De nombreux Canadiens vivent un conflit entre emploi et responsabilités de soin à un proche dépendant, entraînant des difficultés à se maintenir sur le marché du travail. La recherche concernant le soutien organisationnel aux employés proches aidants étant encore jeune, nous avons entrepris une recherche exploratoire visant à identifier les formes de soutien auxquelles les proches aidants ont réellement accès en milieu de travail. Des entrevues semi-dirigées ont été menées entre 2014 et 2015 auprès d’employés proches aidants québécois (N=23). Notre analyse indique que l’accès aux mesures de conciliation travail-famille dépend presque exclusivement de la relation avec le supérieur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207